A planning refusal in England is a decision on the submitted proposal. Your next step is to understand the reasons before choosing whether to revise the design, challenge the decision or stop pursuing that scheme.
What documents should you read first?
Collect the decision notice, officer's report and the exact drawings considered. Find your council's planning register if you need copies. Separate the formal refusal reasons from objections or comments that were not reasons for the decision.
For each reason, record the policy cited, the part of the proposal criticised and the evidence used. Ask which issues might be resolved by a design change and which concern the principle of development. This creates a practical brief for the next assessment.
Should you redesign or appeal?
A revised proposal makes sense to investigate where a specific change could address the problem. An appeal asks for the decision to be reconsidered through the applicable appeal process. It should have a reasoned planning case, not simply repeat that you disagree.
The government's householder appeal guidance explains the route for relevant home projects. Other decisions, including conditions and different application types, may use another procedure. Confirm the correct route before preparing documents.
How long do you have to appeal?
For a refused householder application, the usual deadline is 12 weeks from the decision letter. Enforcement-related cases can have shorter deadlines. Check the official appeal deadline guidance immediately; do not assume discussions about redesign preserve your appeal rights.
What can you learn from other decisions?
Look for the issue the decision turns on, then compare the evidence and design with your own scheme:
| Example | What changed or remained unresolved |
|---|---|
| 40 Skeena Hill, Wandsworth | The revised scheme reduced the rear extension and removed a bulky roof element after an earlier refusal and dismissed appeal. The register records approval with conditions. |
| 175 Lyham Road, Lambeth | The inspector accepted the mansard's design in its particular street context and allowed the appeal with conditions. |
| 30 Ferndene Road, Lambeth | Additional structural drawings did not resolve the basement evidence gaps. The appeal was dismissed even though other objections were not upheld. |
These examples show different routes through a refusal, not your chances of winning an appeal. Follow the links to the original records and check the decision dates.
Can you switch to permitted development?
A different scheme might qualify, but refusal does not create permitted development rights. Use the permitted development checker to investigate a revised proposal and read the certificate guide if formal confirmation is appropriate. Keep the rejected and proposed drawings clearly distinguished.
What happens to the money already paid?
Review your agreement and the application costs guide. A council fee is not normally refunded simply because permission was refused.
For projects accepted under our pay-on-approval homeowner offer, our pricing page explains the planning design fee position after refusal. Council and Portal charges are separate, and appeals are outside the fixed fee. Agree the scope and cost of any further work before commissioning it.
Reviewed local examples
See how particular schemes were assessed. These cases illustrate the issues to investigate; they do not establish permission for your property.
- Bromley: 36 Glebe House Drive: front symmetry and tree evidence mattered
Appeal dismissed, 19 December 2024
- City of London: 90 Liverpool Street: changing a condition still required noise controls
Appeal allowed with revised conditions, 24 December 2025
- Hounslow: Vine Lodge: extra homes did not outweigh heritage and site impacts
Appeal dismissed, 20 February 2026
- Islington: 4 Arlington Avenue: neighbouring mansards did not justify another
Appeal dismissed, 26 March 2026
- Lewisham: 108 Durham Hill: reducing the extension changed the assessment
Appeal allowed with conditions, 14 November 2024
- Newham: 36 Pulleyns Avenue: a neighbouring extension was not a reliable precedent
Appeal dismissed, 19 July 2024
- Westminster: 13–14 Randolph Road: basement depth changed the outcome
Committee resolved to refuse, 18 March 2025
- Wandsworth: 40 Skeena Hill: revisions addressed the earlier refusal
Register records approval with conditions, 22 May 2025